Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile by 2026?

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The event here is a public Iranian agreement to give up, ship out, or place under outside control any part of its enriched uranium stockpile before the deadline. In prediction-market terms, a YES share pays out if that specific statement is made in public; a NO share pays out if it is not. Because the contract only counts a clear public pledge, not rumours or private diplomacy, the market turns on wording as much as on policy.

The closest comparison is the 2015 nuclear deal, when Iran agreed to ship low-enriched uranium out of the country and accept tighter inspections under the JCPOA framework. Iran has also moved material before, including a 2015 shipment to Russia, showing that stockpile transfers are not unprecedented. But the present setup is narrower: it requires an explicit public agreement to surrender enriched uranium by the deadline, and recent reporting suggests Tehran has been more willing to discuss dilution, storage or transfer to a third country than direct handover to the United States. That helps explain why the crowd price is at 0% YES: the bar is a public commitment, not a vague opening or a reversible technical step.

Traders should watch for any joint statement, Iranian foreign ministry announcement, or mediated proposal tied to U.S.-Iran talks, as well as whether Russia or the IAEA is named as a custodian. A recent report in Le Monde on 17 April said Donald Trump claimed Iran had agreed to hand over enriched uranium, but the underlying details were contested, and later accounts described Iranian resistance to direct transfer. Any scheduled talks, deadline extension, or change in sanctions posture could matter, but only a formal public agreement by Iran should move this market to YES.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4

Methodology

We track Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile by 2026? on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.