IFK Goteborg vs. Degerfors IF - More Markets

Platform comparison

Market context

IFK Göteborg are due to host Degerfors IF in an Allsvenskan fixture at Gamla Ullevi, and this “More Markets” contract will settle on whether additional match-related outcomes are triggered before the window closes. In prediction-market terms, a **YES** share pays out if the specified condition happens, while a **NO** share pays if it does not; with the crowd-implied probability at **100% YES**, the market is pricing the outcome as fully expected.

That kind of reading is easiest to understand against the football record. Göteborg have had the better head-to-head in recent meetings, including four straight wins reported in preview data, while broader summaries show a clear overall edge in the fixture history as well. The league table context also matters: Göteborg and Degerfors were close in the lower half of the Allsvenskan standings ahead of the match, which helps explain why traders may treat match-linked “more markets” as largely binary once line-ups and the final setup are known.[2][4][13][19]

The main catalysts to watch are the confirmed team sheets, any late injury or suspension news, and whether the match timing or coverage changes what is counted inside the settlement window. Pre-match reports noted Göteborg had come off a heavy defeat away to Sirius, while Degerfors were also in poor form, so late information on rotation or absences could affect how sub-markets are framed even if the base fixture remains unchanged.[2][16] The match was scheduled for 14:00 local time, with the market window ending later the same day, so traders would typically focus on official announcements before kick-off and any in-play dependencies that the contract rules may reference.[3][7][14]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Prediction Market UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does Polymarket cost to trade?

Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Prediction Market UK trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.