Tunisia vs. Japan - Total Corners

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Tunisia and Japan met in a FIFA World Cup group match that finished 4-0 to Japan, with the official live coverage and match reports recording Japan’s controlled win and a 5-3 corner count in the game.[1][2][9] For a prediction market, a **YES** share pays out if the event defined by the market settles true; a **NO** share pays out if it does not, so the quoted crowd-implied probability is the market’s view of that outcome rather than a forecast of who wins the match.[1][2]

That historical result matters because corner totals often track game state as much as team strength: a one-sided match can still produce a modest or even elevated corner count if the trailing side presses late, while a slow, low-event match can stay under even with plenty of possession. Japan’s 4-0 win showed the side can generate sustained attacking pressure, but the recorded corner figures were not extreme, which is a useful reminder that goals and corners do not always move together.[1][9] Tunisia’s exit from the tournament also reduced any incentive for conservative, qualification-minded play in that specific fixture.[1][2]

For traders, the main catalysts are line-up news, tactical selection and any last-minute competition context, such as suspensions, injuries or squad rotation, because these affect crossing volume, shot volume and pressure in wide areas. In World Cup coverage around this match, Japan’s attacking efficiency and Tunisia’s defensive collapse were the key storylines, so any new team-news update or schedule change that alters expected tempo would be the most relevant input for a corners market.[1][5]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews Tunisia vs. Japan - Total Corners across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at Prediction Market UK — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Prediction Market UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Prediction Market UK?

Zero. Prediction Market UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.