Jordan vs. Algeria - Total Corners

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The underlying real-world event is the FIFA World Cup Group J match between Jordan and Algeria, played on 22 June at 11:00 PM ET in San Francisco. Algeria won 2–1, with Amine Gouiri and Nadhir Benbouali scoring for the visitors, while Jordan’s sole goal came from their own attack[4]. The game produced just one corner for Jordan and ten for Algeria, with two of Algeria’s goals scored directly from corner kicks[2][3]. This outcome is now settled, meaning the prediction market for “Total Corners” has concluded its settlement window as of 03:00 UTC on 23 June 2026[3].

In prediction markets, a YES share means you believe the stated condition will be true, while a NO share means you believe it will not. For this market, the condition was whether the total corners would exceed a set threshold; the crowd-implied probability of 0% YES indicates the market believed the threshold would not be met. Historically, World Cup debutants like Jordan often struggle to generate corners against top-tier sides, as seen in this match where Jordan held only 28% possession and took just eight attempts[1][2]. Comparable Group J games in 2026 show similar patterns: low-corner outputs from weaker teams against dominant opponents, reinforcing why the 0% YES probability was rational before the result was known.

Traders should monitor official match reports and live data feeds for final corner counts, as these are the primary catalysts for settlement. Recent coverage from The Athletic confirms the final corner tally and highlights how Algeria’s attacking style, led by Riyad Mahrez, generated sustained pressure from corners[1][3]. No further announcements or schedule changes are expected, as the match has already concluded. The only dependency now is the official confirmation of the corner count by FIFA, which has already been published in the match report[4]. With the result settled, the market’s outcome is final, and no new information will alter the settlement.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Prediction Market UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Prediction Market UK?

Zero. Prediction Market UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Prediction Market UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.