New Zealand vs. Egypt - Total Corners

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

New Zealand play Egypt in a World Cup match, and this market asks whether the game will finish with *at least* the listed total number of corners, depending on how the contract is defined on the exchange. In prediction markets, a **YES** share pays out if the outcome happens and a **NO** share pays out if it does not; a crowd-implied probability of **0% YES** means traders currently assign almost no chance to the corners threshold being reached.

That price should be read against how corner totals behave in football: they are noisy, but they usually move with match state, territory, and crossing volume rather than final score alone. In the recent New Zealand-Egypt meeting reported by match trackers, the sides generated **7 corners** in total, with New Zealand taking **4** and Egypt **3**[4]. That is a useful reference point, but not a forecast by itself, because tournament matches can open up quickly if one team trails early.

For traders, the main catalysts are likely to be team news, tactical shape, and the game script once line-ups are confirmed. A more defensive setup can suppress corners, while an early goal, sustained pressure, or a side chasing qualification can lift them sharply; Fox Sports also listed the match with a **2.5-goal** total, which suggests the market expected a relatively controlled game rather than a wide-open one[1]. Any late changes to starting attackers, full-backs, or set-piece takers matter because they can change crossing frequency and corner volume before kick-off[1][7].

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Prediction Market UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Prediction Market UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Prediction Market UK?

Zero. Prediction Market UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.